Administrator
|
Hey friends, a couple years back I put a brand new radiator hoses on my truck. Recently, I noted a leak to which I ultimately traced to the upper radiator hose. While I've not removed the hose, it "appears" to be good, thus I have to think the problem may be the hose clamp itself, or just maybe a combination of both. I think the clamp I'm using is the OEM clamp (see photo), a double wire configuration but I'm not sure. I'm pretty sure the hose is a Gates replacement, as I don't usually skimp on this stuff.
Regardless, what I am sure of is that these types of connections require a constant tension style clamp, which I do not believe is what I have with this double wire style clamp. Maybe I do, don't know.....can anyone vouch to this? Is this the correct style clamp that Ford put on our trucks? I think I'm going to replace the hose and possibly the clamps. Can anyone make a recommendation on these items?
John
"Blackie" - 1986 F150 4x4 - Mildly warmed over 351W HO - Original owner |
Administrator
|
John - I've not gotten to the shop yet to measure the hose size as you requested, but will when the second cup of Joe is depleted.
However, I did have a leak like you are having in the same spot - upper radiator hose. It was discussed starting in this post of Big Blue's Transformation, and it appears to have been partially due to the style of clamp I was using. However, a few posts farther down there's this statement, and I can't tell if you have the clamp close to the "ring" or not: Last, I shortened Big Blue's hose by about 1" and put the clamp on the left in the pic in the post right in front of the "ring", and have had no leaks since.
Gary, AKA "Gary fellow": Profile
Dad's: '81 F150 Ranger XLT 4x4: Down for restomod: Full-roller "stroked 351M" w/Trick Flow heads & intake, EEC-V SEFI/E4OD/3.50 gears w/Kevlar clutches
|
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Machspeed
John, the constant tension clamps are the ones that are a bear to R&R unless you have the proper pliers to use on them. Here is a website that carries them: https://belmetric.com/clamp-full-tab-constant-tension-9mm-50mm/?sku=CTC44BAND12&gclid=Cj0KCQjwho-lBhC_ARIsAMpgMoemhVJ_sBqPYcyeN6qWoBTlT0jzymkmxwISKcErRtE4jpXR5iRUuT4aAoobEALw_wcB
I started using them on my Chrysler Lebaron convertible as I kept getting a lower radiator hose leak.
Bill AKA "LOBO" Profile
"Getting old is inevitable, growing up is optional" Darth Vader 1986 F350 460 converted to MAF/SEFI, E4OD 12X3 1/2 rear brakes, traction loc 3:55 gear, 160 amp 3G alternator Wife's 2011 Flex Limited Daily Driver 2009 Flex Limited with factory tow package Project car 1986 Chrysler LeBaron convertible 2.2L Turbo II, modified A413 |
Administrator
|
I measured the OD of the hose at that fitting on BB and it is right on 2".
Gary, AKA "Gary fellow": Profile
Dad's: '81 F150 Ranger XLT 4x4: Down for restomod: Full-roller "stroked 351M" w/Trick Flow heads & intake, EEC-V SEFI/E4OD/3.50 gears w/Kevlar clutches
|
In reply to this post by Machspeed
I can vouch that those two wire clamps is what Ford used from the factory.
I can also vouch that Ford changed this clamp to a universal worm type clamp. B7AZ-8287-B Motorcraft # YF-230 : Worm Type: fits 1 1/2" to 2 1/2" Obsolete. If you want genuine Ford here is a package of 10 for $197.10 YIKES YF-230 Hose Clamps E-BAY I personally would find another clamp that is comparable.
Truck: 1981 F-150 Explorer / Engine: 300-6 California MCU Feedback System / Trans: T-18 - 4 speed / 2.75 Ford Rear Axle Open Diff.
|
In reply to this post by Machspeed
I actually like wire hose clamps. The "old" Panasonic Pedestal (Resistance) welders at work use them for stock cooling hose connections. A pain to service when replacing old rotten hoses, but the clamps themselves don't leak. If I could get them, I'd probably use them.
--- I used to use (and still use on the water pump and water neck) "racing" clamps (the style with spot welded tabs and a machine threaded stud for tensioning). But ever since I installed a champion radiator, I've had a leak at the lower radiator connection... clamp was bottomed out and was not round (more of a lemon shape). By dumb luck, this morning is when I got around to swapping it for a more traditional hose clamp... we'll see if that helps at all. I had to make the same swap when converting to a 1985+ radiator (upper hose connection is larger) and I've had no issues with that joint. However, traditional hose clamps didn't work at the water neck or the water pump (as with regular hose clamps they leaked).
1984 F150: 300 L6, AOD, RWD. EEC IV / TFI, Feedback Carter YFA Carb. Stock everything but radio (for now).
|
Administrator
|
I've always been partial to the Norma embossed tooth conventional hose clamps.
They come in three widths and don't have any sharp edges. (also available from BelMetric)
Jim,
Lil'Red is a '87 F250 HD, 4.10's, 1356 4x4, Zf-5, 3G, PMGR, Saginaw PS, desmogged with a Holley 80508 and Performer intake. Too much other stuff to mention. |
In reply to this post by 85lebaront2
The style of clamp 85lebaront2 posted is all I use anymore, with the pliers made for they they're easier than worm style which I've always hated using.
|
Administrator
|
Thanks friends! I thought the double wire clamps on my truck were original and as much as I want to keep them, I'll be removing them for constant tension style clamps. There is a good reason manufactures are using these constant tension style clamps today. Several good videos on YouTube regarding this. Here's one.
John
"Blackie" - 1986 F150 4x4 - Mildly warmed over 351W HO - Original owner |
Administrator
|
Interesting video. And I tend to agree with most of what he said. However, at 1:54 he said "And that's why manufacturers never use the worm-style clamps." How does that square with what Ralph said: "I can also vouch that Ford changed this clamp to a universal worm type clamp."
Gary, AKA "Gary fellow": Profile
Dad's: '81 F150 Ranger XLT 4x4: Down for restomod: Full-roller "stroked 351M" w/Trick Flow heads & intake, EEC-V SEFI/E4OD/3.50 gears w/Kevlar clutches
|
Administrator
|
I'm pretty sure he's talking present tense, Gary! Used in the past but not today. All the hose clamps on my Focus St are constant tension, as are those on my kid's Honda's and my wife's Murano.
John
"Blackie" - 1986 F150 4x4 - Mildly warmed over 351W HO - Original owner |
Administrator
|
I can buy that. And I do know that I've had leaks from clamps I thought were tight. So I'll start using the constant-tension ones as I put Dad's truck together.
(And, btw, there is actually miniscule progress on that as Steve/Foxford33 and I are working together to nail down the OD lockout switch. )
Gary, AKA "Gary fellow": Profile
Dad's: '81 F150 Ranger XLT 4x4: Down for restomod: Full-roller "stroked 351M" w/Trick Flow heads & intake, EEC-V SEFI/E4OD/3.50 gears w/Kevlar clutches
|
Our Xterra had constant tension, when I did the head gaskets on it I put worm gear clamps back on because it was so tight I couldn't get tools on most of the clamps.
Had to cut a few hoses and take them off when I got parts out of the way. I like them, just a bear in tight spots.
Dane
1986 F250HD SC XLT Lariat 4x4 460 C6-Sold 1992 Bronco XLT 4x4 351W E4OD 1998 GMC Sierra SLE K1500 350 4L60E Arizona |
With the right tools they're even easier in tight spots than the worm gear ones. One of the pliers I have has the clamping part on a short cable, and with all of them you can lock it open, so you slip it on easy and release it without having to try to get a socket or screwdriver in.
I wish all manufacturers used them, my '21 q60 has the worm gear style, but nissan is notorious for not keeping up with the times. |
In reply to this post by Gary Lewis
I can see Ford changing the clamps yet again from when our trucks were built.
Could be why the Ford Motorcraft worm type clamps is obsolete. I can also see that the constant tension style would take all the guesswork out of tightening it, and would make installation on an assembly line much quicker and easier. Worm type clamps have their uses though, and I'd still keep a few for emergency repairs. -------------------------------------- P.S. I'm thinking the Ford Motorcraft worm clamps are so expensive is due to Con-cours type restorations. Any theories??
Truck: 1981 F-150 Explorer / Engine: 300-6 California MCU Feedback System / Trans: T-18 - 4 speed / 2.75 Ford Rear Axle Open Diff.
|
Administrator
|
Naugh........eBay weasel who thinks he's sitting on a gold mine. Sad thing, somebody will buy them.
John
"Blackie" - 1986 F150 4x4 - Mildly warmed over 351W HO - Original owner |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by 85lebaront2
Bill, I ordered clamps from the company that you listed. Thank you for posting it! To all......I'll leave a response here as to what I ordered and how all this worked out. FYI, the upper radiator hose has two different measurements. Don't assume they are the same!!!
John
"Blackie" - 1986 F150 4x4 - Mildly warmed over 351W HO - Original owner |
Administrator
|
I switched to them after dealing with a lower hose leak on my 1985 Lebaron. It was at the radiator tank but hard to see due to the intercooler and fan assembly. When a friend and I found it, he had some of these clamps so we put one on and it never leaked again.
Bill AKA "LOBO" Profile
"Getting old is inevitable, growing up is optional" Darth Vader 1986 F350 460 converted to MAF/SEFI, E4OD 12X3 1/2 rear brakes, traction loc 3:55 gear, 160 amp 3G alternator Wife's 2011 Flex Limited Daily Driver 2009 Flex Limited with factory tow package Project car 1986 Chrysler LeBaron convertible 2.2L Turbo II, modified A413 |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Machspeed
Ok, I need to revive this thread 'cause someone posted "I'll leave a response here as to what I ordered and how all this worked out." And I need to know.
That's 'cause it looks like my power steering system leak is at the tee where the return from the frame-mounted cooler joins with the "used" return from the hydroboost and goes into the Saginaw pump. As you can see below, I used the screw type clamps and it appears that one or more is leaking. Following up on Bill's recommendation of Belmetric.com I see that their 16mm has a Mfrs Published Crimping Range of 15.7mm - 17.5mm. My hose measures 16.7mm when it is on the barb, so it seems like that 16mm clamp is the right one. Yes? But are there better tools with which to install them than slip-joint pliers?
Gary, AKA "Gary fellow": Profile
Dad's: '81 F150 Ranger XLT 4x4: Down for restomod: Full-roller "stroked 351M" w/Trick Flow heads & intake, EEC-V SEFI/E4OD/3.50 gears w/Kevlar clutches
|
90 degree bent-nose pliers work okay for the smaller ones.
1982 Bronco restomod in progress: Built 4.9L, T19 4spd, 9" 3.00 rear w/ Eaton TrueTrac, 31" tires, fuel injection soon
https://www.youtube.com/@jimjamauto |
Edit this page |