Administrator
|
Thanks, David. That helps a bunch. So 26 MPG was available, but at a driveability cost.
As for the camshaft, I haven't found specs for them. However, if you go to our page at Documentation/Engines/300 Six and then the Specifications page you can see that in some years there were several different ratings for torque, and at different RPM.
For instance, here are the 1983 specs. You can see that the Fuel Saver package got a bit higher compression ratio. And the F-150 4x2 w/Man. Trans. & 2.47 axle had more torque at a lower RPM than any other combination.
Gary, AKA "Gary fellow": Profile
Dad's: '81 F150 Ranger XLT 4x4: Down for restomod: Full-roller "stroked 351M" w/Trick Flow heads & intake, EEC-V SEFI/E4OD/3.50 gears w/Kevlar clutches
|
I remember most of the commercials in the first post (I've seen the Mr Majestyk one on YouTube before, but I don't recall it from my childhood).
One thing I get a kick out of is their comparing a full-size truck to compacts (around 1:00 and 2:30). I suppose it's a valid comparison if you're saying they get the same mileage. But it seems like apples and oranges, and really doesn't give you any basis for believing that the Ford is the better product. I'm reminded of when I was shopping for my 1985 F-250 in late '84. I went in planning to buy a Ford truck and only needed the salesman to help me get the options I wanted on the order form. But he had to give me his canned spiel about why I should buy a Ford. About the first thing he sais was that Ford trucks are built Ford tough. I pointed out to him that he was telling me that Ford trucks were built as tough as Ford trucks are build, which really doesn't say anything. At the time Chevy was also talking about Chevy tough. Only Dodge actually gave you an external comparison, saying that Dodge trucks were Ram tough. None of the commercials made any claims at which was the toughest, Fords, Chevies or male sheep. But I duess if you don't make any claims then you don't have to be able to back them up. Still, those were fun commercials, and all the trucks I've owned have been Fords!
Bob
Sorry, no '80 - '86 Ford trucks "Oswald": 1997 F-250HD crew cab short box, 460, E4OD, 4.10 gears "Pluto": 1971 Bronco, 302, NV3550 5 speed, Atlas 4.3:1 transfer case, 33" tires "the motorhome": 2015 E-450-based 28' class C motorhome, 6.8L V-10 "the Dodge": 2007 Dodge 2500, 6.7L Cummins |
Administrator
|
Bob, I think it's more about American auto makers realizing that they were losing some serious ground to their Japanese competitors. From around 73 to the mid 80's the big three were rolling out some real junkers. I grew up in a Ford family and I remember my father buying a brand new 79 Ford Fairmount Station wagon. Jeez, that thing was a piece of junk. Poorly built, poorly designed, flat out horrible automobile. And, it wasn't even the worst of what came out back then. We didn't have it long when he traded it off for a Subaru wagon, a far better car.
John
"Blackie" - 1986 F150 4x4 - Mildly warmed over 351W HO - Original owner |
Administrator
|
Yes, that was a particularly bad stretch. I remember looking at a Dodge Aspen during that time that was on the show room floor. I could see so many flaws in the body I was stunned.
But Motor Trend said they were the car of the year. However, Motor Trend now says this: Dodge Aspen and Plymouth Volare: Great Idea, Lousy Execution
|
Edit this page |