Here is a link to a FB ad for a 240 engine and parts:
https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/item/173451200679204/?ref=messenger_banner I was looking at this because I am looking to swap out my 3.8v6 and this looks like it has all the parts from the perches, radiator, to exhaust. Is the engine worth anything? Wondering if this is a worthwhile look for someone looking to swap engines. Thanks, Alex
1982 F100 3.8L v6
|
Those perches are for an older truck, so they won't fit yours. About the only thing that would fit is the engine, but inline six cylinders have different perches than your original V6 and a V8.
|
Thanks Shaun. Thought it was worth a shot. On Wed, Jan 22, 2020, 8:23 PM salans7 [via Bullnose Enthusiasts] <[hidden email]> wrote: Those perches are for an older truck, so they won't fit yours. About the only thing that would fit is the engine, but inline six cylinders have different perches than your original V6 and a V8.
1982 F100 3.8L v6
|
Administrator
|
Just fyi, the 240 is the little brother to the fabled 300. The latter is a true truck engine - lots of torque at low RPM. I wouldn't hesitate to put a 300 in a truck, but I'm not sure I'd put a 240 in.
Gary, AKA "Gary fellow": Profile
Dad's: '81 F150 Ranger XLT 4x4: Down for restomod: Full-roller "stroked 351M" w/Trick Flow heads & intake, EEC-V SEFI/E4OD/3.50 gears w/Kevlar clutches
|
My '71 has a 240ci Gary. It's just fine. I have hauled a car
trailer with a car on it, no issues at all. On 1/22/2020 10:58 PM, Gary Lewis [via
Bullnose Enthusiasts] wrote:
Just fyi, the 240 is the little brother to the fabled 300. The latter is a true truck engine - lots of torque at low RPM. I wouldn't hesitate to put a 300 in a truck, but I'm not sure I'd put a 240 in.
Pete's Ponies
Mustang RUSToration & Performance 1982 F100 Flareside 1983 Bronco |
Administrator
|
Good to know, Pete. Thanks!
Gary, AKA "Gary fellow": Profile
Dad's: '81 F150 Ranger XLT 4x4: Down for restomod: Full-roller "stroked 351M" w/Trick Flow heads & intake, EEC-V SEFI/E4OD/3.50 gears w/Kevlar clutches
|
That being said, it's not a heavy high optioned truck. Things
were still very basic in '71 :) They came with 3.50:1 rears as
well. On 1/22/2020 11:07 PM, Gary Lewis [via
Bullnose Enthusiasts] wrote:
Good to know, Pete. Thanks!
Pete's Ponies
Mustang RUSToration & Performance 1982 F100 Flareside 1983 Bronco |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by PetesPonies
I’ve owned and used both the 240 (in the ‘68) and two different 300’s. In the pic above I pulled this 4x4 donor home with the 240 engine truck. It’s not a bad engine at all, but 300’s are plentiful and a bit stronger. You mostly notice it when hauling. I never saw any fuel efficiency advantage with the smaller displacement.
SHORT BED 4-DOOR DIESEL: 1986 F350 4x4 under construction-- 7.3 IDIT ZF5+GVOD
STRAIGHT SIX 4X4: 1981 F150 2wd to 4x4-- 300 I6 close ratio diesel T19, hydroboost brakes, Saginaw steering BIG F: 1995 F-Superduty under construction— converting to 6.9L IDI diesel ZF5+DNE2 |
My 62 F100 had a 240 in it orignally, It was a good little engine. I never had any problem towing with it. Then again, it also had 750/16's and 4.11 gears in it.
Steve
86 Bronco, XLT, 5.0 EFI, EEC IV, AOD, IFS, limited slip front and rear, 3.08 gears, Tilt steering, factory AC |
Edit this page |